Publishers, authors, and ISPs may be subject to boycotts. There have been cases where people brag about illegal activities that they have done on social media. Many countries have banned or censored the internet content. One difference is that national borders are more permeable online: residents of a country that bans certain information can find it on websites hosted outside the country.
The Trump regime may be moving in that direction, as is shown by its recent attempt to get the IP addresses of every visitor to a site organising demonstrations against him.
By allowing search engines to operate in new territory they must agree to abide to censorship standards set by the government in that country. For this reason the internet must be allowed the same protection When Mill and the founding fathers of the US constitution spoke of the freedom of the press they were concerned about the primary and most powerful organ of the media at that time, the print press.
It stops fake news. Nowadays they would more likely be concerned with preventing censorship of the broadcast media and the internet which are our prime means of distributing information. They can hide and accessed X-rated contents.
In authoritarian countries the censorship of the net is far more complete, and often impossible to justify. Who do you think should determine if content is inappropriate?
Although hacking will occur no matter what internet censorship laws may be in place, by creating internet censorship regulations with strict and mandatory penalties for a violation, it could become possible to reduce the number of hacking incidents that occur.
Terrorism is another type of crime that affects many countries.